The Ultimate Fall-Back Position
I know I've blogged only about Peter Bronson this week, but today's column requires a response. Two responses actually. First, I find it almost howlingly funny that Bronson, in his effort to come up with some argument in favor of Issue 3 that doesn't sound like irrational fear-based gay-bashing and after almost a year and a half of attacking Judge Dlott over the policing collaborative, now argues that all this talk about Issue 3 being discriminatory should cease because the Sixth Circuit upheld the law. And beyond being a blatentlt internally inconsistent about-face, his argument also shows a stunning (or intentionally self-serving?) lack of comprehension of the role of the federal courts. While I usually disagree with him, this is one of the few times I can say that Bronson truly should be embarassed by his argument.